European Journal of Political Theory

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alweiss, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
European Journal of Political Theory, Vol. 2, No. 3, 307-318 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/1474885103002003004

Collective Guilt and Responsibility

Some Reflections

Lilian Alweiss

Trinity College, Dublin alweiss{at}tcd.ie

Does our responsibility extend to deeds that have been performed in our name? Is our modern understanding of responsibility in need of revision? Arendt holds that it is not necessary to revise our conception of responsibility since there are two forms of responsibility: a moral and a political one. Margalit, in turn, argues that our conception of responsibility is too narrow. We are not only morally responsible for the deeds we have performed or neglected to perform but also for the deeds carried out in our name. I believe neither position to be entirely coherent: Arendt is mistaken to argue that collective responsibility is free from moral expressions and Margalit conflates political with moral responsibility and confuses guilt with shame. The article concludes that moral responsibility is distinct from collective responsibility, even though the former retains elements of the latter.

Key Words: H. Arendt • guilt • A. Margalit • moral • personal and collective responsibility • political • shame • B. Williams


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social ScienceHome page
M. O. Heisler
Challenged Histories and Collective Self-Concepts: Politics in History, Memory, and Time
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, May 1, 2008; 617(1): 199 - 211.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Journal of Social TheoryHome page
C. Kantner
Collective Identity as Shared Ethical Self-Understanding: The Case of the Emerging European Identity
European Journal of Social Theory, November 1, 2006; 9(4): 501 - 523.
[Abstract] [PDF]