| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
DOI: 10.1177/1474885103002003004 Collective Guilt and ResponsibilitySome ReflectionsTrinity College, Dublin alweiss{at}tcd.ie Does our responsibility extend to deeds that have been performed in our name? Is our modern understanding of responsibility in need of revision? Arendt holds that it is not necessary to revise our conception of responsibility since there are two forms of responsibility: a moral and a political one. Margalit, in turn, argues that our conception of responsibility is too narrow. We are not only morally responsible for the deeds we have performed or neglected to perform but also for the deeds carried out in our name. I believe neither position to be entirely coherent: Arendt is mistaken to argue that collective responsibility is free from moral expressions and Margalit conflates political with moral responsibility and confuses guilt with shame. The article concludes that moral responsibility is distinct from collective responsibility, even though the former retains elements of the latter.
Key Words: H. Arendt guilt A. Margalit moral personal and collective responsibility political shame B. Williams
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||

