Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
European Journal of Political Theory
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vighi, F.
Right arrow Articles by Feldner, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Ideology Critique or Discourse Analysis?

Zizek against Foucault

Fabio Vighi

Heiko Feldner

University of Cardiff

The following article examines the theoretical foundations and practical consequences of Slavoj Zizek's critique of Foucauldian discourse analysis. It does so by uncovering Zizek's idiosyncratic approach to the question of ideology critique. The aim of our investigation is twofold. First, we attempt to demonstrate the implications of Foucault's failure to theorize the generative principle of sociosymbolic formations; second, we argue that by conceiving the Real of class antagonism as the disavowed core of ideological fantasy, Zizek rectifies Foucault's inconsistency while simultaneously opening up a vital political space for the reconceptualization of the paradigm of ideology critique. Our article does not attempt to bring into dialogue Foucault's theory of discourse with Zizek's theory of ideology; rather, it stages an encounter between the two. The encounter involves a contrastive comparison, the tertium comparationis of which is the problematic of how Foucault's and Zizek's respective frameworks may help us conceptualize political change. Against this background and criterion it is possible to establish where and why their social theories differ, and to assess the extent to which Zizek's theoretical choices are preferable to Foucault's.

Key Words: class • discourse • enjoyment • Foucault • ideology • Lacan • power • psychoanalysis • Real • Zizek

European Journal of Political Theory, Vol. 6, No. 2, 141-159 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1474885107074347
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Cultural Studies <=> Critical MethodologiesHome page
K. S. Kidwell
Politics, Performativity, Autopoiesis: Toward a Discourse Systems Theory of Political Culture
Cultural Studies <=> Critical Methodologies, August 1, 2009; 9(4): 533 - 558.
[Abstract] [PDF]