| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Agnes Heller and the Question of HumanismUniversity of Sydney This article explores the vagaries of Agnes Heller's relationship to humanism. It initially outlines a brief account of both the historical adventures of humanism and of the great debates in the middle of the 20th century that conditioned the contemporary reception of the concept of humanism. It then analyses Heller's own unique intellectual formation under the tutelage of Lukács. After briefly outlining her initial commitment to his humanist programme for the ‘Renaissance of Marxism’, it looks in more depth at her initial critique of its humanist philosophical anthropology and her efforts, under the auspices of Arendt, to develop a more sophisticated account of the human condition. The analysis of Heller finally explores the impact of a postmodern awareness of contingency, fallibility and historical open-endedness on this account. The article concludes by pointing to both the commonalities and differences with the contemporary critical humanism of Tzvetan Todorov. It is argued that despite the many parallels, these differences signify Heller's final parting of the ways with humanism strictly speaking and also represent unresolved issues for any reanimation of contemporary humanism.
Key Words: Arendt • contingency • critical humanism • critique of the subject • Heidegger • Heller • human condition • humanism • Levi Strauss • Lukács • reflective postmodernism • Renaissance of Marxism • Sartre • Todorov
European Journal of Political Theory, Vol. 6, No. 2,
125-140 (2007) |
|||
 |
|
|
 |
|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
