| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Patriotism, Cosmopolitanism and Humanity in Victorian Political ThoughtQueen Mary College, University of London, UK, varouxakisge{at}yahoo.com This article analyses the articulation of the relationship between patriotism and cosmopolitanism or commitment to humanity in the writings of some major Victorian political thinkers. It is argued that: (a) there was no neat distinction between patriotism and nationalism in the thought of the time; (b) patriotism was seen as a stepping stone to universalistic commitment to humanity rather than as opposed to or incompatible with the latter; (c) most thinkers avoided the term cosmopolitanism, because of some of its associations, and preferred to use love of humanity or similar terms to refer to universalistic commitments; (d) all thinkers discussed here believed that some form of patriotism was necessary, while all of them complained that the term was being misused by most of their contemporaries and inveighed against some misconceived and morally reprehensible version of patriotism; and (e) most discussions of patriotism and universalism were conducted in a religious or quasi-religious language. The main focus of this article is on John Stuart Mill (1806-73), Matthew Arnold (1822-88), Herbert Spencer (1820-1903), Thomas Hill Green (1836-82), Henry Sidgwick (1838-1900), Frederic Harrison (1831-1923) and, to a lesser extent, Frederick Denison Maurice (1805-72), John Robert Seeley (1834-95) and Charles Henry Pearson (1830-94).
Key Words: Arnold cosmopolitanism Green Harrison humanity Maurice Mill nationalism patriotism Pearson Seeley Sidgwick Spencer
European Journal of Political Theory, Vol. 5, No. 1,
100-118 (2006) |
|||